Through the CARES Act, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) enacted a permanent change to the Home Health rules. The changes now allow NPs and PAs to certify and perform Home Health supervision or certification. Previously, only physicians could bill for these services. Effective for claims with dates of service on or after March 1, 2020, Nurse Practitioners (NPs), certified Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNSs), and Physician Assistants (PAs) may bill the following codes:
Reference: Section 3708 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (Pub. L. No. 116-136) amended sections 1814(a) and 1835(a) of the Social Security Act. The scope and size of the projected COVID-19 financial impact is shocking.
According to the National Association of ACOs (NAACOS), factoring of variances in disease severity, hospitalization rates, etc., the epidemic could cost Medicare more than $115 billion over the next year. They assess this will hit clinics that participate in ACOs since providers are held accountable for their patients’ associated healthcare costs. Likewise, Medicare Advantage plans face similar challenges. NAACOS anticipates ACOs will experience a 6 – 18% spending increase due to COVID-19. NAACOS and other organizations with a substantial stake in the transition to alternative payment methods and value-based models continue to seek CMS and the federal government to provide some protection against the anticipated penalties that could result. Healthcare is historically recession-proof; illness occurs in bad times like in good times and insurance covers most associated costs. However, the recession looming from COVID-19 may prove significantly different. Unemployment is increasing nationwide and money is getting tighter in the face of uncertainty. On top of that, in many cases insurance coverage is tied to employer-sponsored plans. For those still employed and covered, more people have historically high deductibles and cost-shares making them less likely to seek care and fill prescriptions. Clinics are feeling the pinch, too, as people opt to stay at home rather than seek care – and clinics strive to minimize the risk of disease spread by limiting which patients come in and for what. Some primary care clinics report up to 70% reductions in use of health care services, which means in about 45 days, a 70% reduction in revenue. Granted, some of those services are merely deferred and will likely occur later, maybe in the summer. Still, clinics need solutions now to generate revenue, so they can remain open for later. Also, without the routine face to face with their patients, providers need the tools to keep in touch and to manage their patients, especially those at the greatest risk. This is where clinics should consider services like Chronic Care Management (CCM) and Remote Physiologic Monitoring (RPM, aka Remote Patient Monitoring). These are two strategies that are very straight forward and can be applied to 100% of clinics that see Medicare patients. Additionally, if the practice can support it, reduced restrictions for telehealth services and other non-face-to-face services enable providers and staff to remain engaged with patients and generate revenue otherwise lost if unable to see patients in office. Since the beginning of the PHE, more and more primary care clinics are experiencing lower patient volume, reduced revenue, PPE shortages, etc. and many are unsure how long they can sustain operations; the financial strain is impacting their ability to keep the doors open, lights on, and staff employed. Introducing CCM and RPM now can help your clinic and your patients not only in the short term, but sustainably into the future. For more information on CCM and RPM strategies, click here. References: Cutler, David. (2020) How Will COVID-19 Affect the Health Care Economy? Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/channels/health-forum/fullarticle/2764547 Leventhal, R. (2020). Projected Financial Impact of COVID-19 Leaves Healthcare Leaders Searching for Help. Retrieved from https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/finance-revenue-cycle/article/21131880/projected-financial-impact-of-covid19-leaves-healthcare-leaders-searching-for-help Primary Care Collaborative (PCC). (2020). Multiple reports and survey results retrieved from https://www.pcpcc.org/ CMS released another update 30 April 2020, impacting the delivery, coding, billing, and reimbursement of non-face-to-face care during the current PHE. The document is 221 pages and, as always, it is recommended to refer to the source document. Keep in mind that this information has not been finalized in the CFR and might have some slight edits by the time you see it in final form.
Voice-only visits (i.e. phone calls, no video) will receive higher reimbursements, backdated to March. Providers should use telephone codes 99441 – 99443 for voice only E/M services for Medicare; these correspond to 99212 – 99214. The full discussion begins on page 122. This change does not mean you can bill a 99213 for a voice-only telehealth visit; you would use 99442 for the comparable time or MDM. This modification was made for instances when the two-way, audio and video standard required for a Medicare telehealth service might not be available, CMS felt there could be “many circumstances where prolonged, audio-only communication between the practitioner and the patient could be clinically appropriate yet not fully replace a face-to-face visit.” CMS also posted information concerning selecting appropriate level for Medicare office / outpatient E/M visits furnished via telehealth; the discussion on time for E/M begins on page 135. Level selection for these services when furnished via telehealth can be based on MDM or time. The IFC also addresses the impact of COVID-19 on Part C and Part D quality ratings, beginning on page 137. Source: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/covid-final-ifc.pdf We have been sending e-mails out through our various contact lists and connections over the past couple of weeks and concluded it best to post any updates to one, single location from which everyone can see. The one constant during this PHE has been change. Practices have been working hard to keep up with new information impacting covered patient services, modifiers, etc. coming out almost daily. Clearly, if you are working off information updated last week, you might be out of date already. So here is our attempt to get up to date (as of today, anyway). As always, what we provide is intended to inform and educate but we do not pretend to be experts in all areas of healthcare. The most up-to-date information and posted changes will come from your individual payers as they post their specific plan update information, so please ensure you are checking with them frequently. Here is a chronology of CMS updates and the associated references: 17 April: Telehealth coverage flexibilities now include RHCs and FQHCs for the duration of the COVID-19 PHE. Reminder, telehealth services require both audio and video. The entire release notice is here. RHCs will be paid at their all-inclusive rate (AIR), and FQHCs will be paid based on the FQHC Prospective Payment System (PPS) rate. Medicare will also be paying RHCs and FQHCs for the portal codes 99421-99423 the same way they pay physician offices (7 days cumulative time) as well as the G2012 and G2010. 14 April clarification on telehealth added below with the 6 April information. 10 April: New and revised immunology codes provided
6 & 7 April: Coding for telehealth
“To modifier or not to modifier?”, that was the question (among others). Much confusion arose over how to properly code E&M services, POS, modifier use, etc. during the PHE. Well, CMS has spoken on this matter one more time with the information updated to the Federal Register this month as well as during the recording they posted on 7 April. For PART B Medicare patients, you CANNOT bill face-to-face E&M codes for any encounter in which the provider – patient interaction does not utilize audio AND video. Some PART C Medicare Advantage plans have different guidelines – BE SURE TO FOLLOW WHAT THE PAYER STATES. If you want their money, follow their rules. Medicare PART B requires live audio-video interaction with the billing provider to legally bill the code (not with the MA). Some examples to help illustrate the latest take: Office-based MD/DO/NP/PA not doing nursing home, hospital work, etc.:
Reminder: use MDM or time when billing E&M via telehealth. According to the 6 April posting to the Federal Register, CMS stated they are maintaining the current rules for MDM. Time, however, ended up being a slightly different outcome: Clarified 14 April, use either CPT time or Federal Register time. Please note that this only applies to telehealth performed during the COVID-19 PHE. If seeing a patient in office, and billing for time only if more than half the visit is spent counseling and / or care coordination, the normal CPT times are to be used. Use of time or MDM alone for in-office visits doesn’t go into effect until 2021… maybe. 2 April: Still more updates coming out from CMS. I will be sending these with the hope that you will also share with all the HCPs and offices you work with, colleagues, and friends that can further share the info and (hopefully) have a positive influence on patient care in this challenging time. Medicare clarified guidance for E/M Telehealth documentation requirements: need EITHER Time or MDM for E/M level. Telehealth involves synchronized video and audio interaction between the provider and patient. Only provider time counts. As previously reported, the Tele-Health originating site rules were suspended 17 March 2020, effective back to 6 March 2020. That means the patient’s home can be the originating site during the emergency period. This should be finalized in the CFR on 6 April, but the draft is out. Yes, patients can communicate from their home to the provider at a ‘distant site’. Requirement for both audio AND video remains; however, available applications temporarily include non-HIPAA compliant tools Skype and Facetime. We recommend still using a HIPAA-compliant app such as Zoom that also allows for easy recording and downloading and clearly documenting the consent in the recording and the note. Several EMRs have this functionality via their portal or an add-on, as well. Additionally, all Medicare beneficiaries can use telehealth services for common visits and preventive screenings – the rural area requirement is also waived. Effective 31 March, add 2 new HCPC codes for specimen collection: · G2023: Specimen collection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Coronavirus disease [COVID-19]), any specimen source · G2024: Specimen collection for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Coronavirus disease [COVID-19]), from an individual in a skilled nursing facility or by a laboratory on behalf of a home health agency, any specimen source These codes indicate "any source" so don't restrict these only to the nasal swabs. These are only for trained personnel and not for any patient self-tests. Along with other health care organizations, the American Heart Association (AHA) compiled interim guidance supporting rescuers that may treat victims of cardiac arrest with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The increasing number of COVID-19 cases creates the need to address potential modifications of or changes to established practices concerning resuscitation efforts. Accordingly, the AHA posted new algorithms and a free course which support the published interim guidance concerning COVID-19 patient treatment. Please review all related resources and statements here.
Reference: AHA COVID-19 Resource Page. https://cpr.heart.org/en/resources/coronavirus-covid19-resources-for-cpr-training |
Authors/SourcesOur articles are derived from authoritative sources, subject matter experts, HCPs, and responsible agencies. ArchivesCategories
All
|